Critical situation in Ukraine: an uncertain outcome

Critical situation in Ukraine: an uncertain outcome


After 143 days, the conflict between Ukraine and Russia seems set to continue. After investing heavily in conquering Severodonetsk, Lyssychansk and Lugansk, regions of eastern Ukraine, Moscow's troops are restocking before a likely next assault. What will be the outcome of the conflict? QMI Agency spoke to two experts. 

The situation is critical for Ukraine, while Russia is well entrenched in the east of the country, in the Donbass region. Two experts, however, have a divergent vision on the likely outcome of the conflict, which is likely to persist for several months.

A former military intelligence officer, Simon Leduc, finds it hard to see how the troops of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky , could repel the Russians.

“Ukraine has received a lot of anti-tank weapons, but I have the impression that almost all of them have been used,” said Simon Leduc. In March, the Ukrainians requested 500 anti-tank missiles from the Americans a day and they have received 6,000, in total, so far. Things are not going well for Ukraine. Currently, Russia is bombarding non-stop, but it is not advancing.”

“According to several indicators, the Ukrainian front is beginning to give way in the Donbass region, however, he added. Thursday, the statistics are to be taken with reservations, but Russia would have killed up to 1000 Ukrainian soldiers in a single day. There were tabarnouche bombings.”

According to his reading of events, Russia is waging a war of attrition to weaken Ukrainian troops. The conflict is not likely to end quickly.

“We have months and years to go,” said Simon Leduc. If it's not in Ukraine, it's going to be in Lithuania or Latvia. There is no doubt in my mind that the conflict will not stop in Ukraine.”

“Significant military losses”

For his part, the retired brigadier general of the Canadian Armed Forces, Richard Giguère, believes that nothing is decided yet. He, too, is of the opinion that the conflict will not end soon.

He underlines the fact that Vladimir Putin's troops have suffered significant military losses in men. In terms of material resources, Moscow is forced to dip into its reserve by using old weapons.

“Every inch costs Russia dearly,” noted the man who had a 36-year career in the Canadian Armed Forces. Russia occupies nearly 20% of the territory of Ukraine, including several Russian-speaking areas.[…]. Moscow had a hard time advancing into territory that was more favorable to them. Ukrainians will never give up. I don't see the country falling.”

According to Richard Giguère, even if Ukraine fell under the control of Moscow, the Ukrainian people would not allow themselves to be governed by Vladimir Putin.

The war in numbers

  • Beginning of the Russian invasion: February 24, 2022
  • 143 days of war (Saturday)
  • Almost 20% of Ukraine under control of Russia
  • 15,544 civilian casualties were recorded in Ukraine, including 5,024 deaths
  • In Mariupol, a city in the south-east fell in May, the Ukrainian authorities evoked nearly 20,000 dead, without providing any proof.
  • Tens of millions of people are in “potential danger of death”
  • < li dir="auto">More than 8.7 million people have fled Ukraine and more than 6 million Ukrainians are internally displaced

On the military front, Western security sources now evoke 15,000 to 20,000 Russian soldiers killed. Ukrainian forces are losing around 100 soldiers every day, according to Kyiv.

Source: The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and AFP

< /p>

Global Food Crisis

The war in Ukraine threatens world grain supplies and food security: “An additional 8 to 13 million people could suffer from undernutrition worldwide if food exports from Ukraine and Russia were permanently impeded by of war,” according to the International Fund for Agricultural Development.

“Cold War 2.0”

In Russia, the media are talking about a “Cold War 2.0”, according to former military intelligence officer Simon Leduc, who carefully monitors what is happening in the country of Vladimir Putin.

“In the Russian media, they verbalized that we are at the height of Cold War 2.0, said Simon Leduc. During the Cold War, Russia had no access to Western services and the country now finds itself isolated as it was then.”

Remember that the Cold War refers to the period of political tensions between the United States and its allies, on the one hand, and the Soviet Union, on the other, during the second half of the 20th century.

“The vision of the Russians is that the Americans are fighting against them in Ukraine, he specified. The real enemy is the Americans and NATO. They believe that the United States wants to harm Russia with alliances.”

Doubts about the will of the Americans< /h3>

Former military intelligence officer Simon Leduc has doubts about the real American objective in Ukraine.

“The Americans supply weapons, but they don't supply so many to win the war, he said. They seem to want to weaken Russia by causing damage. Looking at US decision making, I'm not even sure they want Ukraine to win. If the goal was victory, we would have sent a lot more weapons a long time ago.”

Simon Leduc, however, understands the decision of the country of Uncle Sam.

“The Americans must cover several fronts, he recalled. There are other threats like North Korea or China that could invade Taiwan. They can't put all the eggs in one basket.”

Ineffective weapons as a gift

Several weapons offered by the West to the Ukrainians to fight the Russians would be ineffective, according to Simon Leduc.

“During my career, my specialty was the Taliban, underlines the former military intelligence officer. To combat them, the military equipment was completely reorganized to fight wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. These people don't have artillery, so all of our equipment has been reduced in weight for ease of transport.”

“That means there's less shielding,” he said. It can be transported well, but it is more fragile. The Russians, on the other hand, have big, heavy systems that don't transport well, but are tough. They only have heavy infantry. Our equipment is therefore not suitable.”

However, in June the Americans delivered precision rockets. They gave the Ukrainian army a boost of life, changing the balance of power on the battlefield, which could push Moscow to slow down its offensive, according to experts consulted by AFP. These rocket launchers, guided by GPS, have a range of nearly 80 kilometers. In June, this resulted in the destruction of 20 major Russian ammunition depots and command posts.

Five key points for Zelensky and Ukraine

Specialists consulted by AFP recently presented some key elements to enable Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to triumph.

1. Reclaiming territory: “The political decision for a counter-attack has been made. The campaign to liberate the occupied territories has begun,” Ukrainian analyst Anatoliy Oktysyuk told AFP.

2. Exhausting the enemy: “The Ukrainians only retreat militarily when they no longer have a choice, as in Severodonetsk and Lyssychansk (East). “The Ukrainians made them pay dearly for this territory,” notes a senior US defense official.

3. Maintaining his aura: “I have no indication that (the war) is wearing him down,” former US ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor told AFP. “The pressure must be enormous. But he is holding up. (…) Everyone agrees that his strength lies in the bond he has forged with the Ukrainian people.”

4. Maintaining Ukrainian unity: “We still have to maintain this unity despite the deaths, the deprivations, the fear. For now, no one is talking about negotiations,” said William Taylor.

5. Convince the West: The war has brought Ukraine and the West closer together. Kyiv has also acquired the status of candidate for entry into the European Union. A bigger contribution from the West could make the difference.

Time and oil are in favor of Russia

< p>

Moscow produces 11 million barrels of oil per day and 5 million are for export. According to AFP, Russia earned 93 billion euros in revenue from the export of fossil fuels during the first 100 days of the war, and the majority was destined for the European Union.

This makes retired Canadian Armed Forces Brigadier General Richard Giguère believe that time is on Russia's side. He too believes that the conflict is far from over.

“The longer the conflict lasts, the more it will be a challenge for international cohesion, he said. Everyone is united, but there may be rifts over time due to natural resources. The closer we get to winter, the more energy will be needed for some countries.”