BET À DAY
After 10 months of hearings, it's time for the verdict. At the November 13 trial, the court is due to deliver its long-awaited decision on Wednesday evening on the fate of Salah Abdeslam and his co-accused, tried since September for the worst attacks ever committed in France.
The reading of the deliberations could begin “from 5 p.m.”, announced President Jean-Louis Périès late Monday morning, before the special assize court withdrew to deliberate in a place kept secret after 148 days of hearing.
Before that and in front of a packed room at the Paris courthouse, she gave the floor for the last time to the 14 defendants present — six others, including five senior Islamic State officials presumed dead, are tried in their absence.
“I am not an assassin, I am not a killer”, argued from the box the main of them, Salah Abdeslam, reiterating his “sincere” apologies to the victims.
“ Public opinion thinks I was on the terraces with a Kalashnikov, busy shooting people, public opinion says I was at the Bataclan. You know the truth is the opposite,” the only surviving member of the commandos who killed 130 people in Paris and Saint-Denis on November 13, 2015 told the court.
“If you condemn me for assassinations, you will be committing an injustice”, attacked Salah Abdeslam.
“Blood of the victims”
The prosecution requested against him the heaviest sentence provided for by the Penal Code: life imprisonment with an incompressible security period, which makes any possibility of release minimal.
The 32-year-old Frenchman adopted during the trial “a strategy of constant minimization of the facts”, had estimated the three representatives of the national anti-terrorism prosecution (Pnat). But he “tried to blow his belt” on the evening of the attacks, and has “the blood of all the victims on his hands”.
In a plea aimed at avoiding this “death penalty slow”, his defense recalled that the sentence had only been pronounced four times, against men recognized as “psychopaths” and convicted of crimes committed against minors.
Salah Abdeslam, who argued at the hearing that he had given up using his explosive vest “out of humanity”, is “neither a psychopath nor a sociopath”, hammered one of his lawyers, Me Olivia Ronen.
< p>He is a “deserter performer”, but the sanction requested is worthy of a “military tribunal” which judges “enemies” and not “the accused”, vilified his colleague Me Martin Vettes.
For the “symbol”
Six years after a night of terror that traumatized France and after a river trial marked by the chilling accounts of nearly 400 survivors or relatives at the helm – out of nearly 2,600 civil parties – defense lawyers have put the court warns against the temptation of “exceptional justice” guided by emotion.
On the first day on September 8, the president had wanted “respect for the norm” to remain the ” cap” of this “historic trial”, some reminded him, arguing against the sentences of “elimination”, “revenge” or for the “symbol” required according to them by the prosecution.
“I ask you to make an effort, that of not letting yourself slip”, asked Me Orly Rezlan.
“Justice is not a weapon of anger”, urged Me Marie Violleau , lawyer for Mohamed Abrini, “scheduled” for November 13 but who had given up, as he would do a few months later in Brussels.
The sentences requested against the 20 defendants range from five years life imprisonment, in particular required for the “accomplices” of the attacks, all members of the same jihadist cell whose commandos were “interchangeable” according to the attorneys general.
The irreducible life sentence was It was also requested against Osama Atar, “senior terror executive” of the Islamic State group and sponsor of the attacks, presumed dead in Syria.
Three lawyers have pleaded acquittal for their “innocent” clients. “I am not a terrorist,” repeated one of them in his last words in court on Monday. “I'm very scared of your decision,” admitted another between sobs.